top of page

Team Performance Is Everyone’s Responsibility

  • Writer: Andrea Corcoran
    Andrea Corcoran
  • 11 minutes ago
  • 3 min read


This month, I am exploring collective ownership: what changes when people stop seeing team effectiveness as the leader’s job alone and start seeing it as a shared responsibility.

 

One of the questions I am regularly asked in executive coaching is: “What should I do?”

 

It often comes when something unexpected has happened. A problem has emerged, a decision needs to be made, or something is not going to plan.

 

My first response is usually to explore the situation with them. What are the options? What are they thinking? What could they do next?

 

But then I will often ask another question: “What would your team suggest?”

 

It is a simple question, but an important one.

 

Because we do not have to lead alone.

 

A Team Is More Than a Group of People Who Attend Meetings

 

It is easy for responsibility for team performance to sit heavily with the team leader.

The leader sets the agenda. The leader raises the difficult issue. The leader keeps the discussion moving. The leader follows up. And when something goes wrong, everyone looks to the leader and asks, “What are we going to do?”

 

Over time, this pattern can create a team that is very dependent on its leader.

 

People may attend the meetings, contribute when asked and deliver within their own areas of responsibility. But that is different from taking ownership of how the team works together.

 

Being part of a team means taking some responsibility for how the team performs together, not simply performing your own role well.

 

That includes the quality of the conversations, the decisions being made and whether the team is addressing the things that really matter.

 

From Attending the Team to Contributing to It

 

Collective ownership often shows up in very ordinary moments.

 

It might be a team member saying, “I don’t think we have really answered the question.”

 

It could be someone noticing that the team is moving too quickly to a decision and suggesting they spend another ten minutes exploring the issue.

 

It might mean respectfully challenging an assumption, bringing another perspective into the conversation or asking whether the team is slipping back into an old behaviour it had agreed to change.

 

Sometimes it is simply saying what everyone else in the room appears to be thinking, but nobody has yet been prepared to say.

 

These behaviours do not require a leadership title.

 

They require people to see themselves as responsible for the effectiveness of the team.

 

Solving Problems Together

 

When a leader brings a problem to the team rather than arriving with the answer, something else happens as well.

 

It sends a message.

 

Your thinking matters here.

 

You may already have some ideas, but rather than immediately telling the team what should happen next, they can create the opportunity for the team to think, challenge and solve the problem together.

 

The result may be a better answer.

 

But there is another benefit that is just as important.

 

It builds the culture of the team.

 

People begin to understand that their role is not simply to wait for direction. They are expected to contribute ideas, raise concerns, challenge thinking and help the team find a way forward.

 

And the more often this happens, the less dependent the team becomes on one person having all the answers.

 

The Team Owns the Team

 

Trust and psychological safety create the conditions for people to speak, and once those conditions exist, there is also a responsibility to use them.

 

A high-performing team cannot rely on its leader to continually identify every issue, ask every difficult question and keep everyone accountable.

 

Everyone has a role in noticing what is happening in the room and deciding whether they are going to contribute to making it better.

 

So perhaps the next time something unexpected happens, instead of immediately asking: What should I do?”

 

There is another question worth asking together: “What could we do?”

 

Because that is where collective ownership begins.

Comments


bottom of page